Land Transport NZ is now
part of the NZ Transport Agency
www.nzta.govt.nz
Accessibility | Help | Site index | Contact us
Print version: Problem definition and recommendation form (PDF, 86 KB, 14 pages)
Use the problem definition and recommendation (PR) form for coding:
For the purpose of the monitoring system, identify crash problems by the main crash types or crash situations at the location. Select crash type and optional details codes from the problem coding sheet.
Define recommendations by a combination of action/object keywords and codes selected from the recommendation coding sheet, found at the end of this section.
After filling in the PR form, attach it to the corresponding CL form and include it as an appendix in the crash reduction study report. Send the report and all the forms to the engineering section of the local Land Transport NZ office. The data will be entered in the monitoring database and an implementation report (IR) (see section 4) will be generated and sent to you. Update the IR to show implementation details for recommendations or to record changes if you reject or modify any recommendations.
Detailed instructions follow on how to fill out the PR form. See Appendix B (B2 and B4) for samples of a blank PR form and a completed PR form. The paragraph numbers below correspond to the numbers on the PR form.
For Land Transport NZ use only. (Matched to the ID number used on the corresponding CL form.)
Use the same study name that was given on the CL form. A maximum of 30 characters are allowed for the study name.
Use the same location name as on the CL form. A maximum of 35 characters may be used for the name.
Use the same location number as on the CL form. Two digits only are allowed.
A problem coding sheet to assist with this part of the form is included on page 25 at the end of this section. This information is also repeated in the crash reduction monitoring system quick reference chart (Appendix E).
Crash locations often have more than one problem. At least one but no more than five problems must be coded for each crash location. Code only those that are clearly common factors, or that will be addressed by the recommendations.
If needed, optional details can be added to the crash type to clarify the problem definition.
Problem number
The problem number identifies the problem coded so that it may be linked to any recommendation made (see section 3.8). Note: Code at least one and up to a maximum of five problems at a location.
Crash type
Each problem must be assigned a code from the crash type section on the problem coding sheet. There are 12 crash types from which to choose. The crash movement codes which correspond to these crash types are listed in the table on the next page:
| Crash type | Associated crash movement codes | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | All/general | All or general mixture of codes |
| 2 | Overtaking | AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AG, GE, GB |
| 3 | Head-on (bend) | BB, BC, BD |
| 4 | Head-on (straight) | BA |
| 5 | Lost control (bend) | DA, DB, DC, BF |
| 6 | Lost control (straight) | CA, CB, CC, BE |
| 7 | Rear-end obstruction | EA, EB, EC, ED, EE, FA, FB, FC, FD, FE, FF, GA, GC, GD, GF, MA, MB, MC, MD, ME, MF, MG |
| 8 | Crossing | HA |
| 9 | Turning | JA, JC, LA, LB |
| 10 | Merging | KA, KB, KC |
| 11 | Pedestrian | NA, NB, NC, ND, NE, NF, NG, PA, PB, PC, PD, PE, PF |
| 12 | Other | QA, QB, QC, QD, QE, QF, QG |
See Appendix A (A.1.1 Problem categories), for diagrams linking movement codes to each of the crash types listed above.
Note: Crash type 1: 'All/general' should only be used if all movement types are considered a problem and are likely to be addressed by the proposed recommendations.
Optional details
Each problem may also be assigned a code from the optional details section on the problem coding sheet. This will be used if details are needed to fully describe the crash situation. There are five optional details:
| Darkness | 1 |
| Wet road/ice | 2 |
| Struck roadside object | 3 |
| Speed | 4 |
| Cyclist | 5 |
For example, if the identified problem at the location is crossing-type crashes, eg HA, the coding format is:
However, if the problem identified at the location is crossing-type crashes at night, the coding format is:
Recommendations are defined by a combination of action/object keywords and codes. A recommendation coding sheet to assist with this part of the form is included in this section on pages 26 to 29. This information is also repeated in the crash reduction monitoring system quick reference chart (Appendix E).
Interpretations of keywords for coding actions and objects for the recommendations are shown in Appendix A2.
If no physical remedial works are recommended, do not fill out monitoring forms.
Traffic education/enforcement recommendations are not coded as these recommendations cannot be monitored with the present monitoring system because:
Enter each physical recommendation at a crash location on the PR form using the action and object code numbers from the recommendation coding sheet. Each recommendation is made up of both an action code and an object code. A maximum of 15 recommendations can be coded.
To make it easier to find the appropriate action and object codes, these have been grouped into common treatment categories. There are nine categories:
Treatment categories
100 Surface and layout
200 Markings and delineation
300 Lighting
400 Traffic signs
500 Kerbs, islands and medians
600 Roadside features
700 Traffic flow
800 Control types
900 Geometric alignment
If a recommendation can't be coded, describe it in words and Land Transport NZ will code it, if considered appropriate. Interpretations of action and object keywords are shown in Appendix A, pages 37 to 48.
If more than one option has been recommended and each option has a number of recommendations, code all recommendations for each option. Once an option has been chosen, those recommendations not implemented can later be assigned an implementation status code of 4: works will not be done (see section 4).
Any major changes to the location during the study period which are likely to have affected the crash pattern should be coded as recommendations. They will either have implementation status 5: works done prior to study, or implementation status 6: environmental changes. Alternatively the study period can be amended to start after such works and they do not then need to be listed.
Each recommendation should only be coded once per location, regardless of how many times the recommendation is implemented. For example, if a curve warning sign was recommended for both northbound and southbound directions, code 'install, sign, PW18' only once. However, if you are recommending different signs, e.g. 'install PW18' and 'install PW19', code each separately.
Action number
Action numbers are listed from one to 15. A maximum of 15 recommendations may be coded. Note that you do not have to have 15 recommendations. Use only as many as you need. If there are more than 15 recommendations, record only those that will address the most crashes.
Action category
Action categories do not get coded on the form. They are listed on the recommendation coding sheet (pages 26 to 29) and are a guide to help users find the appropriate action code. There are five action categories:
Within the five action categories are the specific action codes which are used for coding recommendations.
Action code
Each recommendation must be assigned an action code from the recommendation coding sheet (pages 26 to 29). This information is also repeated in the crash reduction monitoring system quick reference chart (Appendix E). To select the action code first select the appropriate treatment category then select the action code. Not all action codes are available for particular treatment categories.
Within each treatment category there are specific object codes that can be used on the PR form. If a specific object you want is not listed use the treatment category code instead.
Object code
Each recommendation/action must be assigned an object code (or a treatment category code) from the recommendation coding sheet (pages 26 to 29).
For example, the recommendation is to 'widen the left turn bay'. On the recommendation coding sheet:
The above example would be coded:
| 1.1.1 3.6 Recommendations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Action no | Action code | Object code | Traffic sign code |
| 1 | 55 | 106 | |
If you can't find the specific object you want, code the most suitable treatment category, eg 100 - Surface and layout, or write the object in using words and it will be coded for you. See Appendix A for definitions of keywords (pages 37 to 48).
Traffic sign code
Traffic sign codes are only used if the recommendation involves the treatment category 400 Traffic signs. All actions involving traffic signs have object code 400. The traffic sign code is used to specify which sign is involved. The traffic sign code is the sign number in the Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings, Part 1: Traffic Signs.
If signs will be installed but you are not sure which signs (e.g. PW18 or PW19) simply code the object code as 400 and code one type. This can be updated later, on the implementation report, if a different sign is used.
For example, 'install a Stop sign' would be coded:
| 1.1.2 3.6 Recommendations | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Action no | Action code | Object code | Traffic sign code |
| 1 | 11 | 400 | RG5 |
Effect
The effect code is used to give an estimation of the likely safety effect the recommendation will have on crashes at the crash location. This effect may be:
For example, the following recommendation, 'widen physical left turn bay', is expected to have a major effect on crashes. This would be filled in as follows:
| 1.1.3 3.6 Recommendations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action no | Action code | Object code | Traffic sign code | Effect |
| 1 | 55 | 106 | 1 | |
This code is used in analysis so recommendations which will have a greater effect can be assessed rather than those with little or no effect.
Linking is the relationship between the identified problems and the recommendations made to address the problems. Each recommendation/action which has an effect of 1 (major), or 2 (minor), must be linked to at least one of the problems identified (crash type coded). An actual recommendation may address more than one problem.
For example, three problems have been identified at a location. Two recommendations were made to address these problems. Recommendation 1 addresses problem numbers 2 and 3 and is expected to have a minor effect on the crashes, while recommendation 2 addresses problem number 1 and is expected to have a major effect on the crashes. The form would be filled in as follows:
| 1.1.2 3.6 Recommendations | 3.7 Linking | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Action no | Action code | Object code | Traffic sign code |
Effect | Links to problem no |
| 1 | 54 | 108 | 2 | 2, 3 | |
| 2 | 11 | 400 | RG5 | 1 | 1 |
Note: The link is between the action number and the problem number, not the crash type. For example, if recommendation 1 is linked to problem number 1 which is crash type 5 (lost control - bend) the linking is to problem number 1 not crash type 5.
The PR form allows the implementation status and date to be entered for each recommendation/action if known. Safety improvement works that have been implemented or planned during the study period, and will have an effect on crashes, should be added to the list of recommendations. The date these works were done, or will be done, should be known and needs to be recorded in the monitoring system. Record the status and implementation date of these improvements.
Status
Refer to the implementation status table in section 4, page 31. The status will normally be one of the following codes:
Date
Implementation dates (in the format year, month, ie YYYYMM) are required for all recommendations/actions with status 1 or 5. Do not enter any dates for recommendations with status 2.
Estimate what the total cost of all recommendations for the entire crash location will be.
Note: If recommendations for more than one option have been provided, record the cost of the highest cost option. The estimate can be updated once an option has been selected and implemented.
Crash data
This gives a record of both injury and non-injury data used.
Enter the total number of reported injury and non-injury crashes in the study period specified on the CL form. This is normally the complete five calendar years before the year of the study. Record injury and non-injury data separately.
Enter the number of reported injury and non-injury crashes in the study period which are to be addressed by the recommended remedial works. Record the number of addressed injury and non-injury crashes separately.
Enter the estimated number of reported injury and non-injury crashes which are expected to be saved by the proposed works. Use the same timeframe for the estimated crash savings as the study period. For example, if a five-year study period was used, the estimated saving should be for five years. Enter injury savings and noninjury savings separately. This is the number of crashes not a percentage saving.
Enter a simple text description of the crashes which are addressed by the recommendations, eg ‘all night-time crashes’ or ‘downhill loss of control crashes’. This could include crash problems or situations that had not been recorded in the study period but would also be addressed by the improvements.
Problem coding sheet
| Crash type | Optional details | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| All/general | 1 | Darkness | 1 |
| Overtaking | 2 | Wet road/ice | 2 |
| Head-on (bend) | 3 | Struck roadside object | 3 |
| Head-on (straight) | 4 | Speed | 4 |
| Lost control (bend) | 5 | Cyclist | 5 |
| Lost control (straight ) | 6 | ||
| Rear-end/obstruction | 7 | ||
| Crossing | 8 | ||
| Turning | 9 | ||
| Merging | 10 | ||
| Pedestrian | 11 | ||
| Other | 12 | ||
Note: The crash type list above is a list of crash movement types.
The appropriate movement codes associated with each of the above crash types are shown in section 3.5 as well as illustrated in Appendix A1, pages 33 to 36.
Recommendation coding sheet
| TREATMENT CATEGORY |
ACTION CATEGORY | ACTION | Action Code |
OBJECT | Object Code |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SURFACE & LAYOUT - 100 |
SURFACE LAYOUT | 100 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | Bridge | 101 | |
| Seal | 13 | Carriageway/lanes | 102 | ||
| Move | Move | 31 | Crawler/passing lane | 103 | |
| Upgrade/maintain | Upgrade | 41 | Driveway | 104 | |
| Re-seal | 42 | Flush median (see category 200) | |||
| Modify | Ban/close | 51 | Intersection | 105 | |
| Extend | 52 | Physical bay - left turn | 106 | ||
| Shorten | 53 | Physical bay - right turn | 107 | ||
| Narrow | 54 | Physical bay - parking | 108 | ||
| Wilden | 55 | Ramp | 109 | ||
| Lower | 56 | Shoulder | 110 | ||
| Raise | 57 | Taper | 111 | ||
| Re-design | 58 | Very high friction surfacing | 112 | ||
| MARKINGS & DELINEATION - 200 |
MARKING & DELINEATION | 200 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | Bridge end marker | 201 | |
| Paint/mark | 12 | Bus stop | 202 | ||
| Apply textured /ribbed | 16 | Centreline - dashed | 203 | ||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | Centreline - solid | 204 | |
| Move | Move | 31 | Chevrons – single curve indicators (see category 400, PW67) |
||
| Re-align | 32 | Chevrons – full (see category 400, PW66, rC5, etc) |
|||
| Upgrade/maintain | Upgrade | 41 | Continuity line | 207 | |
| Maintain paint | 43 | Diagonal markings | 208 | ||
| Replace | 45 | Edgeline | 209 | ||
| Modify | Extend | 52 | Edge marker posts | 210 | |
| Shorten | 53 | Flush median | 211 | ||
| Narrow | 54 | Guard rail (see category 600) | |||
| Wilden | 55 | Hatched/painted island | 212 | ||
| Lower | 56 | Hazard marker | 213 | ||
| Raise | 57 | Lane markings – general | 214 | ||
| Increase (# of) | 59 | Lane markings – arrows | 215 | ||
| Add backing board to | 66 | Lane markings – cycle | 216 | ||
| Reflectorise | 67 | Lane markings – left turn | 217 | ||
| Lane markings – right turn | 218 | ||||
| Lane markings – roundabout | 227 | ||||
| Limit lines | 219 | ||||
| No overtaking line | 220 | ||||
| No stopping line | 221 | ||||
| Parking space - painted | 222 | ||||
| Pedestrian crossing | 223 | ||||
| RRPMs | 224 | ||||
| Sight rail | 225 | ||||
| Words | 226 | ||||
| LIGHTING - 300 |
LIGHTING | 300 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | |||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | |||
| Move | Move | 31 | |||
| Re-align | 32 | ||||
| Upgrade/Maintain | Upgrade | 41 | |||
| Repair | 44 | ||||
| Replace | 45 | ||||
| Modify | Extend | 52 | |||
| TRAFFIC SIGNS - 400 |
TRAFFIC SIGNS | 400 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | |||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | Use appropriate sign Move Move 31 code from Manual of Traffic Signs and Markings Part 1: Traffic Signs eg Stop sign is code 400 RG5 Advertising signs/billboards (see category 600) If installing new intersection control use category 800 |
||
| Move | Move | 31 | |||
| Upgrade/Maintain | Repair | 44 | |||
| Replace | 45 | ||||
| Modify | Lower | 56 | |||
| Raise | 57 | ||||
| Increase (# of) | 59 | ||||
| Decrease (# of) | 60 | ||||
| Enlarge | 61 | ||||
| Add backing board to |
66 | ||||
| KERBS, ISLANDS & MEDIANS - 500 |
KERBS, ISLANDS & MEDIANS | 500 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | Bulbous kerbs | 501 | |
| Paint/mark | 12 | Flush median (see category 200) | |||
| Seal | 13 | Hatched/painted island (see category 200) | |||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | Kerb | 502 | |
| Move | Move | 31 | Median barrier (see category 600) | ||
| Re-align | 32 | Pedestrian refuge | 503 | ||
| Upgrade/Maintain | Re-seal | 42 | Raised median | 504 | |
| Maintain paint | 43 | Roundabout (see category 800) | |||
| Repair | 44 | Seagull/splitter island | 505 | ||
| Replace | 45 | Speed hump | 506 | ||
| Modify | Extend | 52 | Throat/fishtail island | 507 | |
| Shorten | 53 | Threshold/gateway/platform | 508 | ||
| Narrow | 54 | ||||
| Widen | 55 | ||||
| Lower | 56 | ||||
| Raise | 57 | ||||
| Reflectorise | 67 | ||||
| ROADSIDE FEATURES - 600 |
ROADSIDE FEATURES | 600 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | Building | 601 | |
| Paint/mark | 12 | Cliff/bank | 602 | ||
| Seal | 13 | Ditch | 603 | ||
| Plant | 14 | Fence | 604 | ||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | Footpath | 605 | |
| Move | Move | 31 | Guard rail | 606 | |
| Re-align | 32 | Median barrier | 607 | ||
| Upgrade/Maintain | Re-seal | 42 | Poles | 608 | |
| Maintain paint | 43 | Trees/vegetation | 609 | ||
| Repair | 44 | Advertising signs/billboards | 610 | ||
| Replace | 45 | ||||
| Modify | Extend | 52 | |||
| Shorten | 53 | ||||
| Narrow | 54 | ||||
| Widen | 55 | ||||
| Lower | 56 | ||||
| Raise | 57 | ||||
| Trim | 62 | ||||
| TRAFFIC FLOW - 700 |
TRAFFIC FLOW | 700 | |||
| Install/add | Allow | 15 | Left turn vehicles | 701 | |
| Remove | Remove (Ban) | 21 | Right turn vehicles | 702 | |
| Parked vehicles | 703 | ||||
| CONTROL TYPES - 800 |
CONTROL TYPES | 800 | |||
| Install/add | Install | 11 | Give way control | 801 | |
| Pain/mark | 12 | Stop control | 802 | ||
| Remove | Remove | 21 | Limit lines (see category 200) | ||
| Move | Move | 31 | Roundabout | 803 | |
| Upgrade/maintain | Upgrade | 41 | Speed limit | 804 | |
| Maintain paint | 42 | One-lane bridge control | 805 | ||
| Repair | 43 | Railway barrier | 806 | ||
| Replace | 44 | Traffic signal (T.S.) control | 807 | ||
| Modify | Extend | 52 | T.S. (upgrade to) Austroads/NZ standard) | ||
| T.S. Phasing | 809 | ||||
| T.S. Other | 810 | ||||
| T.S. Lanterns | 811 | ||||
| T.S. Overhead lanterns | 812 | ||||
| T.S. Arrow lanterns | 813 | ||||
| Speed threshold (see category 500, code 508) | |||||
| GEOMETRIC ALIGNMENT - 900 |
GEOMETRIC ALIGNMENT | 900 | |||
| Move | Re-align | 32 | Crest | 901 | |
| Upgrade/Maintain | Upgrade | 41 | Curve | 902 | |
| Modify | Extend | 52 | Depression | 903 | |
| Increase | 59 | Sag | 904 | ||
| Decrease | 60 | Super elevation/camber | 905 | ||
| Ease | 65 |
Appendix E includes a smaller two-page version of the above. These two pages can be copied back to back and then folded into three to make a simple quick reference chart for use when completing monitoring forms or implementation reports.
Page created: 3 August 2005